View Single Post
Old 08-11-2005, 01:48 PM   Iranian Nuclear Policy Post #1
Miles D
I will not apologize for art
 
Miles D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Memphis, TN
Age: 35
Posts: 3,102
Points: 4,898.46
Bank: 16,657,748.73
Total Points: 16,662,647.19
Donate
Miles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond reputeMiles D has a reputation beyond repute



Iranian Nuclear Policy

The country of Iran recently broke a UN / IAEA seal on nuclear materials and resumed processing Yellowcake / Uranium 4 to get it ready for Uranium 6: Fuel for a nuclear reactor. And the world body is very alarmed at the recent events.

The European countries in Europe are very angry with Iran about this, and sent them a letter expressing how displeased they are. But never mention turning Iran over to the UN Security Council if Iran fails to stop uranium enrichment and, in turn, it's nuclear program by a proposed September Deadline.

So, do you believe this is most problematic (They could put nukes on people and send them abroad)? Or just a way for Iran to succeed in giving it's people another source of electricity?

And if this is a problem, how should the world community deal with it?

Your position please.

Please note... this is not a debate about the Iraq war, but rather the true intentions of the Iran Nuclear Policy. Thanks.

Last edited by Miles D : 08-11-2005 at 02:23 PM
Miles D is offline   Reply With Quote