Phucket

Yeah, when I saw all those numbers, I was stumped. Me and numbers do not mix. However, it's easy to figure out once it has already been pointed out to me.

eramnes

The Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences does not have a listing for this particular number sequence. The closest that you can get is the sequence 4,1,3,2,3,3,5,4,4,6, which is the number of prime factors, counting with multiplicity of sigma(n), the sum of divisors of n. What that means I am not sure (any math people around on the board?), but in any case, it is not the first numbers in that series, and only occurs after the first 14 numbers in the series, so I am guessing that it is not related to that sequence in any case. So as far as I can tell, if it actually is an integer sequence of some kind, it is so far unstudied or undiscovered. The OEIS indexes over 140,000 known sequences, so it would be pretty uncommon for it not to be in there if it is an actual sequence.

In short, I don't think there is a pattern at all. Why don't you let us know what the sequence is? I am curious now...

Sweet Tigger

*Laughs her ass off*

I don't know what the hell its suppose to mean....Just Rofls

I do not see any pattern whatsoever.

catocala_lacrymosa

i tried to solve it,but something wasnt right.ok anyway ill show you the way i tried to solve it
4(1)3(2)3(3)5(4)4(6)3(7)5(8)5(9)4(10)3(11)6(12)6(1 3)
what's left outside is:433543554366
(4)335(4)355(4)366:so the numbers that follow here are logical to be (4)366
if we add this to the sequence above and continue it will be:
4(1)3(2)3(3)5(4)4(6)3(7)5(8)5(9)4(10)3(11)6(12)6(1 3)4(14)3(15)6(16)6(17)
the problem here is that inside the brackets a five is missing,so instead of 15 16 and 17 there may be 16 17 and 18

Crayzee

Um, people are writing things that I'm sure aren't even English.

4(1)3(2)3(3)5(4)4(6)3(7)5(8)5(9)4(10)3(11)6(12)6(1 3)
what's left outside is:433543554366
(4)335(4)355(4)366:so the numbers that follow here are logical to be (4)366
if we add this to the sequence above and continue it will be:
4(1)3(2)3(3)5(4)4(6)3(7)5(8)5(9)4(10)3(11)6(12)6(1 3)4(14)3(15)6(16)6(17)
the problem here is that inside the brackets a five is missing,so instead of 15 16 and 17 there may be 16 17 and 18

I need the weed to understand what was even said here.

Lady Godiva

is it math ? ' cause i use numbers to write something bad for example: bitch : is 2 9 12 3 8, the order of each letter.

Cavercheer03

Ha this is EXACTLY what I thought when I tried to tackle it I figured who ever originally typed it might have typo-ed on the 5....

Bella Lee

ok? idk what ur talking about but write back 2 me so i can explain it and than im sure i can anser that

catocala_lacrymosa

Well,I'm sorry you cannot understand my english guys,as it is not my FIRST language.