In an effort to preserve the "democratic" feel of EvBoard, I've instated a system that provides for a certain level of self-moderation if you will. You the users now have the ability to decide who stays and who goes based on reputation. After a person reaches a certain negative reputation, they will be automatically banned. Please do not abuse this system, as I believe it could really assist EvBoard for the good.

I will not give out the numbers for the new moderation system, so please don't ask.

Also, if you have problems with the system or notice an issue with it, please let me know ASAP. Thanks!

Bloody hell, we've turned into Evboard Survivor!

That actually doesnt sound half bad. Nice idea.

good idea.
eeeeep.
*runs to check rep points*
and i'm here for another week :) lol

What if those post-whore turned their reputation off ?

What if those post-whore turned their reputation off ?

I think that you still have a rep number, even if it isn't displayed. I could be wrong and stupid, however.

I think that you still have a rep number, even if it isn't displayed. I could be wrong and stupid, however.

That'd be correct. :)

I think that you still have a rep number, even if it isn't displayed. I could be wrong and stupid, however.

Yeah you still have one but people can't rep you anymore.

EDIT: forget it... you can still rep :p my mistake !

Yeah you still have one but people can't rep you anymore.

EDIT: forget it... you can still rep :p my mistake !

Yep you just don't see it and you can't rep anyone. So you could be on your way out the door and not know it if you have rep turned off.

..But I LIKE having a Ninja Admin Extraordinaire dictatorship! :( *pout*





lol okay, seriously. It's a good idea. Nice one, ToB. :)

It's sad what has to be done in order to keep the asses out. But a ToB's gotta do what a ToB's gotta do. Well done.

Well, I guess I'm the first to go :-/

Bloody hell, we've turned into Evboard Survivor!

I am so not getting naked for peanut butter and chocolate...

Survivor:EVboard
Outedit, Outpost, Outrep

So is it all user based or will mods still have ban power?

I am so not getting naked for peanut butter and chocolate...

Survivor:EVboard
Outedit, Outpost, Outrep

me neither...but i will eat the gross slugs and cow brain and what not!

:p

good job ToB!

me neither...but i will eat the gross slugs and cow brain and what not!

:p

good job ToB!

isnt that everyday canadian cuisine along with moose bladder?

will mods still have ban power?

http://www.evboard.com/showthread.php?t=20849

Just do a wrong step... and let's see...

I dare you!

:cool:

uh-oh. *looks at rep points* mine are looking kinda low :(
and cfw: why are your reps down so low? you seem so respected on the board, and seem to know everything? that's one thing that has always confused me about you...

So is it all user based or will mods still have ban power?

Mods will always have ban power.

uh-oh. *looks at rep points* mine are looking kinda low :(
and cfw: why are your reps down so low? you seem so respected on the board, and seem to know everything? that's one thing that has always confused me about you...

He has Rep disabled.

He has Rep disabled.
oops. my mistake. heheheh that makes much more sense now :S

That sounds fair enough. :) As long as people don't abuse it, this is a very good idea to incorporate. :D

Self-moderation sounds kinda perverse. I mean, I guess it's fun enough if you do it yourself but it's always way better if somebody else does it to you.

I'm sorry. I'm tired and still horny.

Good idea, though. But I hope it's still not entirely up to us so that if people just don't like somebody they can kick them out even if they've done nothing wrong?

Self-moderation sounds kinda perverse. I mean, I guess it's fun enough if you do it yourself but it's always way better if somebody else does it to you.

I'm sorry. I'm tired and still horny.

Good idea, though. But I hope it's still not entirely up to us so that if people just don't like somebody they can kick them out even if they've done nothing wrong?

Well you have to do a lot of repping before you can rep someone twice. It'd have to be a decent consensus of the board members hitting the person with negs.

Well you have to do a lot of repping before you can rep someone twice. It'd have to be a decent consensus of the board members hitting the person with negs.
Okay, that's good, thanks :)

ToB, is there a way to set it so that the neg point have to be from several different people? otherwise, you might get a couple of people that simply dont like each other and want to get eachother banned unjustly.
its a cool idea. would actualy add some value to rep points, and incentive to get good ones- an therefore good posts. but i think its a little too easy to abuse if its that streight foward.

ToB, is there a way to set it so that the neg point have to be from several different people? otherwise, you might get a couple of people that simply dont like each other and want to get eachother banned unjustly.
its a cool idea. would actualy add some value to rep points, and incentive to get good ones- an therefore good posts. but i think its a little too easy to abuse if its that streight foward.

Mods have control of everything and never ban without a good reason. We have access over all reps received so any attempt of play dirty would be acting like a boomerang.

if someone did 'play dirty' and the mods didn't realise, or if the person was de-repped unnecessary, would it be possible to get unbanned?

isnt that everyday canadian cuisine along with moose bladder?

yup! that and boogers, snails, pig bile, and the like... :p

thanks for clearing that up Gil :)

if someone did 'play dirty' and the mods didn't realise, or if the person was de-repped unnecessary, would it be possible to get unbanned?

I believe I can answer this.

Those of us who have seniority and very high reputation can inflict the most damage on people we don't like. So don't fuck with the people on the top of the reputation list. :D

N00bs who've only been here for a month or two (or less) inflict far less damange with their negative reps. So even if they give out mass neg reps, they don't hurt as much as mine. (and plus the moderators can see it if need be).

So to answer the direct question, I'm sure that if there's 1 case out of a million where someone got banned unnecessarily, the mods would unban him / her. But to date, 100% of the banned people deserved it.

It's a good idea, for us to get more involved in the board.

And MilesD, yes, I agree, they did all deserve it :D

ToB, great idea! :)
Thanks for letting us know!

I hope I can stay here for awhile.. *looks at rep points* .. I guess I can! :p

Self-moderation sounds kinda perverse. I mean, I guess it's fun enough if you do it yourself but it's always way better if somebody else does it to you.

I'm sorry. I'm tired and still horny.

Horny saida entertains me to no end. (honestly, I was going to say that, but you beat me)

I think that's not a bad idea. Since the system is made how it is, and you can't frequently rep the same person, it'd be pretty fair.

I wonder if that evanescencefall kid was banned then. *ponders*

This is a good system though. I was wondering a while back how much someone had to get negged before they got banned, or if it had anything to do with anything. I guess it does now.

*protects green reps with a zappy chain link fence* O_O

I like the idea ToB. At least this was we will no longer have to deal with the few people that really should not be on this board.
Oh God...i hope i have enough points.....i think i do. I like this place and i hope i won't have to leave...
I just hope people don't take advantage of this too too much.

"With great power comes great responsibility." ~Uncle Ben :)

Used wisely, this could be a very effective tool to assist our hard-working mods in doing their job. Those of you who abide by the rules need not worry. Those of you who don't may need to re-evaluate your position in life. For the latter I will simply say...."you are the weakest link....byebye"!!

...."you are the weakest link....byebye"!!Bonita, m'dear, it's 'you are the weakest link...GOOD bye"
:D

Bonita, m'dear, it's 'you are the weakest link...GOOD bye"
:D

Damn. You are right. I am wrong. I hate that shit!! But there shall be no "off with your head" from this Queen. I loves ya too much!! :D

I think ToB made this thread just so he could hear how much everyone loves him. What an attention whore.

I think ToB made this thread just so he could hear how much everyone loves him. What an attention whore.

That's it.

You. Me. Going to Germany, now. :P

*hates to fly*

*hates to fly*

Too bad, you're going anyway, young man. ;)

Eeep :eek:

For Attention of all people who think that they'll be banned the second they piss off an older member of the board - I say don't worry.

ToB isn't going to tell you what the negative limit for automatic banning is, but you can bet your arse he won't have made it so low that one negrep from a paid subscriber would do it. I bet that you'd have to act like enough of a tit that a sustained negrepping by your peers would follow. It'd take the opinions of a fair number of members to oust you from the forums... and if that many of us don't like you, it's for the best that you don't come back anyway.

Don't let this stop you posting. You can say what you like - just be aware that it might now have consequences, so try to post with flair, wit and relevance.

As a happy aside - I hope that by allowing this franchise to the general board population, we've seen the last of these "I hate the mods you're so mean" threads. They made me puke in the first place... but now there's no excuse. If you don't like what someone says - even a Moderator - negrep them and tell them why you've done it. That's your recourse if you feel hard done by.

All in all, a great idea. Cheers, ToB.

:)

In an effort to preserve the "democratic" feel of EvBoard, I've instated a system that provides for a certain level of self-moderation if you will. You the users now have the ability to decide who stays and who goes based on reputation. After a person reaches a certain negative reputation, they will be automatically banned. Please do not abuse this system, as I believe it could really assist EvBoard for the good.

I will not give out the numbers for the new moderation system, so please don't ask.

Also, if you have problems with the system or notice an issue with it, please let me know ASAP. Thanks!

I like it. It seems really cool it's a nice way to get power to the masses... lol

Given my short time here and not really having established myself well enough on this board system I just don't feel good about judging others so to speak. I did one reputation just to learn how to do it (it was a positive reaction.) Perhaps later I will do a bit more but right now I just don't feel I've earned the right to. I know I was given positive reputation out of kindness and I thank those who did it. I apologize to anybody who may be offended or insulted by this post.

Peace to all;

Jeff

lol.looks like ill be next to go.lol

the tribe has spoken....... (snuffs survivor torch)

lol.looks like ill be next to go.lol

the tribe has spoken....... (snuffs survivor torch)

You're still a long long way from being gone. But if you want to be all melodramatic about it, then maybe you are right.

You're still a long long way from being gone. But if you want to be all melodramatic about it, then maybe you are right.
well, when i held my mouse over the rep points square it said i was surely soon to be gone.........

but now it says i can only hope to improve............so im a hopeing.....lol

so does this mean i could be banned because i have one red mark under my name, i dont understand, who does this and why?
that's really mean :(

so does this mean i could be banned because i have one red mark under my name, i dont understand, who does this and why?
that's really mean :(

http://www.evboard.com/faq.php?faq=evboard_qa#faq_rep_dots

Read EvBoard FAQs: If you follow all these rules religiously, you will even guarantee yourself a lifetime.

so does this mean i could be banned because i have one red mark under my name, i dont understand, who does this and why?
that's really mean :(
Well you managed post this, didn't you?

so does this mean i could be banned because i have one red mark under my name, i dont understand, who does this and why?
that's really mean :(

You would not get banned for one red mark, like Shapeshifter said--you were able to post that so no worries. I'm not sure but it seems that when one has one green mark under their belt and get's one neg rep it turns red automatically, but it takes up to 3 or more positive reputation points in order to gain another green mark. So, I'm guessing that you would have to get somewhere around 3 more people to neg rep you in order to get banned.

You would not get banned for one red mark, like Shapeshifter said--you were able to post that so no worries. I'm not sure but it seems that when one has one green mark under their belt and get's one neg rep it turns red automatically, but it takes up to 3 or more positive reputation points in order to gain another green mark. So, I'm guessing that you would have to get somewhere around 3 more people to neg rep you in order to get banned.
The progression of the numbers of dots is not linear, just because you easily got one red dot doesn't mean you'll get more as easily. The reason people can quickly go from 1 gree dot to 1 red dot is you start out with a rep of 10, to get a red dot you only have to get down to -1 for your rep score (which one user who's been here a while can do) to get auto-banned your rep probably needs to be more like -1000 or more (I never did know what the actualy number was). If memory serves me correctly, to be totally honest, no one has *EVER* been automatically banned because of getting negative reps a few people have been on their way before but they had some additional help because they had done thing that would have gotten them rep system was put in place.

Evboard, where you get banned the old fashioned way, you *earn* it. </Smith-Barney 80's commercial rip-off>

it would logically seem to me that if you are being a big enough ass to get enough neg reps to get autobanned you are probably going to piss a mod off to the point he or she will beat the rep system to the punch.Once again, your powers of deduction are dead on.

Ok, this sounds like a great system for the board. I just have one concern I would like to have clarified...this autoban is only pertaining to the amount of NEG (red) reps a user has, not if you have very few Positive (green) reps, like myself right?

Ok, this sounds like a great system for the board. I just have one concern I would like to have clarified...this autoban is only pertaining to the amount of NEG (red) reps a user has, not if you have very few Positive (green) reps, like myself right?
I would recommend reading Diamon's post 3 posts above yours. >.>

Ok, this sounds like a great system for the board. I just have one concern I would like to have clarified...this autoban is only pertaining to the amount of NEG (red) reps a user has, not if you have very few Positive (green) reps, like myself right?
Autobanning only happens when your rep score becomes a very large negative number (let's just assume -1000, which it might or might not be) which no one other than you can see (other than via the mod/admin functions). The score is represented by red dots under your avatar next to all your posts, the number of red dots you would have to have there is something like 10 (again I don't remember exactly) and is very difficult to get a rep that low other than coming here specifically to cause trouble (a la the visitors we had from the Seether board). Receiving netagtive rep comments (that show up in your User CP) by themselves arenothing to worry about unless your reputation score goes very far negative (represented by a lot of red dots under your av).

I'm not sure if that straightens anything out or not, figured I'd add that just in case someone is confusing the red dots from the rep comments and their cumulative effect as reflected under the avatars.

I'm not sure if that straightens anything out or not, figured I'd add that just in case someone is confusing the red dots from the rep comments and their cumulative effect as reflected under the avatars.

Thank you very much. I'm clear on everything now. A user must have a LOT of neg reps to get banned. I was just nervous, because I don't post here enough to get a lot of positive reps, so I was worried under the new system I could be deleted.

Thanks for your help. :)

i dont like this moderation system,cuz i dont want someone get hurts or someone just post the meaningless comment of the member.

i dont like this moderation system,cuz i dont want someone get hurts or someone just post the meanness comment of the member.

Some people WILL neg rep just to be mean. Many more will pos rep if they agree with you, or like you.

I am somoene who reps ALOT, definitely more positive then negative reps. If you get a neg rep you feel is unfair, or it seems like someone or a group are ganging up on you, report it to a mod. Also, you may be upset that you got a neg rep, but look at what it says. Perhaps they are giving you advice on how to post better.

Sounds good and fair, like everyone else said as long as people dont abuse it :).

but if in my User CP appears that many people have gave me green dots and 2 gray dots, why it only appears like I only have one green dot???

because the green dot under your name when you post has to do with your total amount of rep points, which is listed in your user cp. one positive rep does not equal one green dot. the more points you have, the more points your rep is worth to other people.
i think once you get 100 rep points you'll get your second green dot.

ok thank you for answer, now I understand :D

np. see, you have two green dots now :)

I'm not a Paid Subscriber, if I could be one, I would be, but anyway, some people do abuse that whole rep thing! and I hate it when they don't have the guts to tell their name. When the post positive stuff, they usually add their name, but negative stuff, they don't!
but so far I've only got 2 neg rep! but I don't understand why I got them :confused: but life goes on.....

hi,
I want to know if someone got over 100 or 200 negative reps?
I want to find out if someone got more neg reps then me?
Thanks.

I think the border for getting banned should be around -300 or i dont know,
it depends on how many negative reps you get per negative rep. if you get like 20 then -300 should be a border. when i get a negative rep i get 20 negative reputation points.
so if you want to not get banned better not piss someone.:eek:
:eek:

hi,
I want to know if someone got over 100 or 200 negative reps?
I want to find out if someone got more neg reps then me?
Thanks.

I think the border for getting banned should be around -300 or i dont know,
it depends on how many negative reps you get per negative rep. if you get like 20 then -300 should be a border. when i get a negative rep i get 20 negative reputation points.
so if you want to not get banned better not piss someone.:eek:
:eek:
There's only one person (http://evboard.com/member.php?u=41999) on the members list that has a lower reputation than you. But banned people don't show up on the user list so it's possible there are people with lower reps who have been permabanned. As for the how many negative reps you get per negative rep, it depends on who neg reps you. The higher the person's rep, the more "damage" they can do to your rep, but those who have a bad or no rep will hardly make a dent.

There was someone a while back, MoulinRougefrk, or something like that, who like, asked for negative rep. It was kind of amusing. He got banned, though.

I have gotten two neg reps, both from the same person, just because their opinion was different than mine, and they didn't agree with me. I thought that was low, especially as they are are my only neg reps.


How do we give out grey dots? As far as I can see, we can only do green or red...and how many green dots do we need to get another green dot show up in our posts? I thought it was four, I think I was like, one green away from another green dot, then I got a neg rep, and my dots stayed the same, but it took about 8 green reps for me to gain another green.

So does a red dot make it harder to get more green dots?:confused:

How do we give out grey dots? As far as I can see, we can only do green or red...and how many green dots do we need to get another green dot show up in our posts? I thought it was four, I think I was like, one green away from another green dot, then I got a neg rep, and my dots stayed the same, but it took about 8 green reps for me to gain another green.


Taken from the FAQ (http://www.evboard.com/faq.php?faq=evboard_qa#faq_rep_dots)

http://www.evboard.com/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif Grey Dots = Neutral. Between good and bad. If you are given a grey dot in your User CP that means that person is too new to give out reputation.

Taken from the FAQ (http://www.evboard.com/faq.php?faq=evboard_qa#faq_rep_dots)

http://www.evboard.com/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif Grey Dots = Neutral. Between good and bad. If you are given a grey dot in your User CP that means that person is too new to give out reputation.

Okay, so if I get a grey dot, the person is a newbie. Fair enough. Do you know the answer to my other question? How many green reps are needed for another green dot, and if neg reps have anything to do with it?;)

It's a mystery



;)

how many green dots do we need to get another green dot show up in our posts? I thought it was four, I think I was like, one green away from another green dot, then I got a neg rep, and my dots stayed the same, but it took about 8 green reps for me to gain another green.
There is no set number (at least not that means anything that anyone can see directly. Basically whenever someone reps you the amount it changes your reputation is based on what their reputation is. So a rep from Dhamma would be worth maybe more then 10 reps all from low rep users (but high enough that they no longer give gray dots). So the amount your reputation score goes up can vary based on that. Then the number of reputation points it takes to get another green in your posts isn't a fixed number, IIRC it could be set up that you get your second dot at 100 and your third green dot at a reputation score of 500.

So does a red dot make it harder to get more green dots?:confused:
Yes, sort of. If you have a reputation of 90 and you get a neg rep that is worth -10 your score will then be 80, which means if we assume you were tring to get to 100 that you're now 20 away instead of 10.

But the important question is.... why do you care? As long as you don't have a red dot (or dots) under your avatar when you post, you have absolutely nothing to worry about. And even if you did have a negative rep the odds of it leading to you getting banned based solely on your reputation are very, very slim.

It's just a stupid message board on the internet, get over it.

The "levels" of green dots in your profile depend on the number value accumulated from all the positive reps you've gotten. The rate at which you "advance" to the next level of rep depends on the people repping you. For example, let's just say that the "distance" from one green dot to the second is 100 rep points. It would take 10 reps from 10 n00bs with a rep power of 10 points per rep to get you to that next dot. However, it would take 2 reps from 2 veterans each with a rep power of 50 points per rep to get you those 100 rep points you need for your next dot.

I'm not EXACTLY positive if that's how it works but that's just what I've observed from my time here. In any case, I hope you actually understood that! :p

EDIT: What ^^he^^ said. :D

There was an issue with this a couple of months ago. A user by the name of Gothik ruined a game and people mass ganged up on his/her reputation. Sure, s/he flipped out over that, but I saw him/her apologize for it and next thing you know he was banned.

Would that classify as mass-ganging up or was he just too late to apologize? I mean I'm not saying bring the poor bastard back, cause that game is fun to watch, but still, cruelty can only go so far. Then it's pure homocide.

Gothik didn't just mess up a game. He made a lot of rude posts and such, and that's why he was negged.

There was an issue with this a couple of months ago. A user by the name of Gothik ruined a game and people mass ganged up on his/her reputation.
AFAIK, no one "ganged" up on Gothik. It started with one post in a game thread that he got negged for then he decided to come back in that thread and start bitching about it. Which amounted to off topic posts which got him negged again. I was one of the pople that negged him, but it was done totally as an individual and only once. If you're an idiot then lots of people will get annoyed with you, that doesn't make it "ganging up" on anyone.

Sure, s/he flipped out over that, but I saw him/her apologize for it and next thing you know he was banned.

Would that classify as mass-ganging up or was he just too late to apologize? I mean I'm not saying bring the poor bastard back, cause that game is fun to watch, but still, cruelty can only go so far. Then it's pure homocide.
Last I remember of Gothik's posts he was still making off topic posts bitching about getting neg repped, he also proceed go to other threads elsewhere on the board bitching about the neg reps at which point I reported one of his posts and shortly afterwards he was gone. (I woudln't be suprised if he had already attracted the attention of the mods at this point anyway). The neg reputation points didn't cause his banning, his off the handle reaction to getting negative reputation points did.

At least two of the Mods (possibly more) had come into the thread and had a look at what all he posted (Gil and Tracie both posted in the thread although Gil's posts were deleted when Tracie cleaned up the thread to get the game back on track). I wouldn't be suprised if there was even more that went on other than what was seen in the public posts.

To wrap it up with meaphors

Gothik made a mountain out of a mole hill and then proceeded to dig his own grave.

If he had simply made a post and negged for it and brought it up at the appropriate place if he had questions about it that would have been the end of it. There's been a few occurances before of people making one bad post getting negged for it and being given second chances (with their reps reset).

Considering that WASN'T Gothik himself.

First off, he logged in at school and found 7 negs from the same post, or around there, and THEN he started complaining about it because nobody would take care of it. He posted in site feedback before going to public posting. And last I checked the Whine Section is a perfectly appropriate place to post a situation like that in.

Secondly, he told a friend to mind his account and the friend messed things up for him, and he as well as a friend tried telling you that but you wouldn't listen. And his friend made the new accoutn after trying to clarify this and you banned him after two people flat-out told you the truth.

But I'm not a mod, so just ignore my rant.

EDIT: Also, I'll just shut up now. No sense arguing with a mod.

Hail the mod.


P.S. Did he get a polite private message saying where he went wrong and to stop, or was it sudden bannage?

EDIT: Also, I'll just shut up now. No sense arguing with a mod.
diamon isnt a mod.

Hail the mod.
hmmm. i sense sarcasm.

Considering that WASN'T Gothik himself.

First off, he logged in at school and found 7 negs from the same post, or around there, and THEN he started complaining about it because nobody would take care of it. He posted in site feedback before going to public posting. And last I checked the Whine Section is a perfectly appropriate place to post a situation like that in.

Secondly, he told a friend to mind his account and the friend messed things up for him, and he as well as a friend tried telling you that but you wouldn't listen. And his friend made the new accoutn after trying to clarify this and you banned him after two people flat-out told you the truth.

But I'm not a mod, so just ignore my rant.

EDIT: Also, I'll just shut up now. No sense arguing with a mod.

Hail the mod.


P.S. Did he get a polite private message saying where he went wrong and to stop, or was it sudden bannage?

Hi Gothik! You can cut the shit with the 'my friend' routine now. You made a couple of really stupid posts that got you negged in short order. You deleted one yourself, and I deleted another. Within hours, you go bitch and call everyone a noob who negged you, in the same thread. I find no record of a post you made in any site feedback regarding the situation. Then you go on 'noobs' bitchrant number 2. Shortly thereafter you say such classy things as this in the thread:
I hope you choke on the picture and get paper cuts in your throat hole (but not die because your over-reactions are funny)
You then proceed to bitch about it and mention it in 6 more posts in hours to come, with another such fancy quote as:
Alright I F*cking Get It Your A Bunch Of F*cking Noobs Who Cant Take A G*ddamn Joke Now Shut The F*ck Up

Also, no way in hell is it our problem if you give your account to a friend for them to tend to it. What the hell is that anyway? How about you log out and just not use the board while you're not using the board? Sounds like an all-star plan to me.

Hail the mod.

Yes. HAIL THE MOD.

Now GTFO.

There's only one person (http://evboard.com/member.php?u=41999) on the members list that has a lower reputation than you. But banned people don't show up on the user list so it's possible there are people with lower reps who have been permabanned. As for the how many negative reps you get per negative rep, it depends on who neg reps you. The higher the person's rep, the more "damage" they can do to your rep, but those who have a bad or no rep will hardly make a dent.
haha thanks man!
I cant relate to her, checked her posts out.
..oh yeah, she'd like Tourinquet for the funeral, i can relate to that one.
..gonna say hallo..
So, i'm not the champion.thats great.


There was someone a while back, MoulinRougefrk, or something like that, who like, asked for negative rep. It was kind of amusing. He got banned, though.

Oh, hi Rory! Are you planning to put another bullet in me?
EDIT. Oh, yeah, she does. or did.

Oh, hi Rory! Are you planning to put another bullet in me?
Could you maybe calm down, before you get yourself banned, she was stating a fact, there was no way that was an attack on you.

Could you maybe calm down, before you get yourself banned, she was stating a fact, there was no way that was an attack on you.
haha, oh yeah??!
why then i got a neg like 4-5 hours ago?
btw, i'm perfectly calm, i was just asking a question!

haha thanks man!
I cant relate to her, checked her posts out.
..oh yeah, she'd like Tourinquet for the funeral, i can relate to that one.
..gonna say hallo..
So, i'm not the champion.thats great.


Oh, hi Rory! Are you planning to put another bullet in me?
EDIT. Oh, yeah, she does. or did.

It's not a big funny game to see how much negative rep you can get. Being a retarded jackass is what we hope people would try to avoid on this board. I just looked over a bunch of your posts that you got negged for and they're really, really idiotic. Whatever you're trying to get started with Rory here sure isn't helping either. Either learn to use your brain before you post, or just shut up. If you don't feel like doing either of those, I really don't think anyone is going to feel a sense of loss if I ban you.

...Um, sorry to interrupt the drama here, but I was just wondering if there was a way to view reps that you got a long time ago that no longer show up on your User CP.

I got a really nice one a long way back that I liked, but I can't see it anymore. I meant to ask months ago but I forgot. No big deal if you can't; I was just wondering.

...Um, sorry to interrupt the drama here, but I was just wondering if there was a way to view reps that you got a long time ago that no longer show up on your User CP.

I got a really nice one a long way back that I liked, but I can't see it anymore. I meant to ask months ago but I forgot. No big deal if you can't; I was just wondering.
The only people that can see reputation other than the 10 currently visible to you on the User CP are moderators.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y14/Ihateretail/byegothik.jpg

Nooo. I wish him and his e-wife (http://www.evboard.com/showpost.php?p=969469&postcount=4) all the best. Maybe if we all pitch in we can get him something besides a cracker jack box ring <3.

*donates one of his*

Nooo. I wish [SexyBeast16] and his e-wife (http://www.evboard.com/showpost.php?p=969469&postcount=4) all the best. Maybe if we all pitch in we can get him something besides a cracker jack box ring <3.

*donates one of his*
LMAO. NICE one Ghetto.

I have a quick question - out of curiosity. For moderators then... is it just that they're able to see a longer list of their past reps? Like an extra ten or so? And is there a reason behind that. I thought that was kind of interesting.

LMAO. NICE one Ghetto.

I have a quick question - out of curiosity. For moderators then... is it just that they're able to see a longer list of their past reps? Like an extra ten or so? And is there a reason behind that. I thought that was kind of interesting.
they're just power hungry nazis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

they're just power hungry nazis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Haha, you're right, that must be the reason.

I have a quick question - out of curiosity. For moderators then... is it just that they're able to see a longer list of their past reps? Like an extra ten or so? And is there a reason behind that. I thought that was kind of interesting.
The moderators can go into the reputation system and look at all reputations given. By default it shows everyones, but they can search and give criteria of who gave or who received the rep. SO when someone like Gothik/SexyBeast16 complains about their neg rep they can go in and say, show me every rep that they ever received, or if they get a complaint that a particular user is just neg repping a person for the heck of it they can say show me every rep comment Diamon has ever left. Of both and show every rep that Diamon ever left for Jane. Which makes patterns of abuse very easy to pick up. But that's all over on the Moderator/Admin Control Panel side of things on the user side of things they just see the last 10 reps they received just like any other user.

LMAO. NICE one Ghetto.

I have a quick question - out of curiosity. For moderators then... is it just that they're able to see a longer list of their past reps? Like an extra ten or so? And is there a reason behind that. I thought that was kind of interesting.

All your rep can be seen or modified in any way by a mod.

Edit: Also what Diamon said.

Oh yeah and mods can delete any rep comment, change the amount it affects your rep, or just outright set the value of your rep to any given number.

Another point of note: this is only for super moderators. Aqua colored forum mods can't go poking around with people's profiles.

Today's lesson on how the reputation system works was brought to you by the letter Q and the number 7.

Wow thanks guys. That definitely makes a lot of sense, and it's always nice to get a glimpse into the crazy things that we regular members are oblivious too. ^.^ Ahhh, so wonderful to be naive and carefree...

I've left countless naughty rep comments to Tyler and mods can see them :eek: I'm in so much trouble.;)

I've left countless naughty rep comments to Tyler and mods can see them :eek: I'm in so much trouble.;)

*wags finger* Naughty, naughty, rooster...:mrgreen:

It's not a big funny game to see how much negative rep you can get. Being a retarded jackass is what we hope people would try to avoid on this board. I just looked over a bunch of your posts that you got negged for and they're really, really idiotic. Whatever you're trying to get started with Rory here sure isn't helping either. Either learn to use your brain before you post, or just shut up. If you don't feel like doing either of those, I really don't think anyone is going to feel a sense of loss if I ban you.
ok people, i'll remove it, and not talk about it.
:o

Whoa, you have a lot of negative rep....I'll give you some postive rep because you seem nice:)

~Sarah

Whoa, you have a lot of negative rep....I'll give you some postive rep because you seem nice:)

~Sarah
Thank you Sarah! I appriciate it! It was so nice to hear that!:) :)

Okey, so, back to thread-reputation points, i hope i didnt ruin this threds subject. Appologies one more time!
So, this thread's bout those reputation points.continue.;)

Ok, so if someone reps you and then a mod goes and deletes that post, do you automatically lose the rep point as well?

The rep won't be in the list but the points should still be there.